|
TRI
LAB UPDATES
LONG-TERM
DESIGN FLOW - PART 2
(Vol. 1, No. 8)
Will
the soil environment cause geocomposite drains
to lose flow capacity over time?
(Read Long-Term Design Flow - Part
1)
This
Lab Update is the second in a two-part review of long-term design flow
issues . and answers. Following is some background on the calculation
of long-term design flow, discussion of one industry proposal, and an
outline of TRI's proposed approach to testing the long-term flow capacity
of geocomposite drains.
In-plane
Drainage
In-plane drainage is described in terms of flow, q, or transmissivity,
1. A product's allowable transmissivity can be described as follows:
1allow
= ______________1ult________________
RFCR
x RFINTR x RFCC x RFBC
Where:
1ult = transmissivity from QC testing
RFCR = Creep reduction factor (RF)
RFINTR = Intrusion reduction factor (RF)
RFCC = Chemical precipitate Clogging RF
RFBC = Biological growth Clogging RF
One
Current Industry Proposal
Recent industry discussions have included a proposal that determination
of 1allow should require only creep and intrusion measurements as follows:
1allow
= 1 100 Hr (with site-specific sub and super stratum).
_________________________________________
[(RFCR)
(RFCC x RFBCdefault]
Where:
1 100 Hour = transmissivity measured using site-specific boundary
conditions and 100 hour seat time
This
proposed "simplification" is in recognition that the industry
has yet to develop a reasonable protocol for quantifying the chemical
and biological clogging potential associated with product-specific and
site-specific conditions. In lieu of test data, the following "default"
reduction factors have been suggested and may be added to the above equation.
| Drain
Type |
RFCC |
RFBC |
| Surface
Water (infiltration) |
1.2 |
1.5 |
| Leachate
Collection |
1.75 |
1.75 |
| Leak
Detection |
1.5 |
1.5 |
Concern
about Baseline Transmissivity
Of some concern is the reliance on a transmissivity test that requires
a 100 hour (4 day) seat time. This promises to minimize the number of
replicates, leading to designs that are based on very limited data. Conversely,
using the transmissivity results from quality control tests (1ult) provides
a statistically significant basis for deriving design/specification values
since these tests are run routinely under standard boundary conditions.
Notes
on Geotextile Intrusion
TRI believes that intrusion reduction factors related to geotextiles
can be determined via independent short-term testing and then applied
to the measured flow accordingly. TRI's experience with transmissivity
testing of geocomposite drains overlain by soils has indicated that intrusion
primarily occurs as the normal load is being applied, causing immediate
flow reduction. Conversely, time-dependent flow capacity is affected much
more significantly by long-term creep of the core or geonet. This may
not be true if the geotextile is not laminated.
TRI's
Proposed Testing Protocol
Based
on the discussion above, TRI proposes the following approach to product
testing:
1
allow = ________________1ult_______________
RFCR x RFINTR x (RFCC x RFBC)default
- 1ult = Transmissivity from QC testing - This data will be provided
and certified by the manufacturer.
- RFCR = Creep reduction factor -
- Step 1. Determine thickness vs. flow using various normal pressures.
- Step 2. Determine thickness vs. time for various normal pressures.
- Step 3. Determine flow vs. time for various normal pressures using
results of Steps 1 and 2.
- RFINTR = Intrusion reduction factor -Using two different soils (sand
and clay), determine flow vs. normal pressure for increasing time, until
flow stabilizes.
- RFCC and RFBC = Chemical precipitate and Biological growth Clogging
reduction factor - Carefully select appropriate default values.
Details
on Testing
Task 1: Establishment of Normal Compressive Load vs Thickness Relationship
- Geocomposite is tested for 10,000+ hour creep resistance using a combination
of conventional and SIM test procedures. Selected normal compressive loads
should bracket anticipated field conditions. Conventional testing will
be performed to confirm and augment the SIM data.
Task
2: Thickness Dependent Transmissivity Testing - Using the data generated
in Task 1, TRI selects specific thicknesses under which to perform transmissivity
testing. Each test will be performed at the selected thickness with the
following hydraulic gradients: 0.1, 0.25, 0.33, 0.5, and 1.
Task
3: Intrusion - A matrix of short-term transmissivity tests is performed
using two different soils and three different normal loads. One long-term
transmissivity test (100 hr seat time) is performed with each soil at
the highest normal load and a series of different gradients.
|
TRI/Environmental
Lab Updates
Volume 1, No 8, 27 May 8, 2000
|
|
|
|